April 14, 2026

Architectural Concepts Guide

Elevating Home Design Standards

Eight recommendations to adopt materials passports and accelerate material reuse in construction: insights from academia and practice

Eight recommendations to adopt materials passports and accelerate material reuse in construction: insights from academia and practice
  • Nicholson, V. & Miatto, A. Architects as catalysts of reuse in construction. Nat. Cities 1, 179–181 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme. Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a zero-emissions, efficient and resilient buildings and construction sector (United Nations Environment Programme, 2022).

  • Ahmed, A. et al. Assessment of the renewable energy generation towards net-zero energy buildings: a review. Energy Build 256, 111755 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lützkendorf, T. & Balouktsi, M. Embodied carbon emissions in buildings: explanations, interpretations, recommendations,. Build. Cities 3, 964–973 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. Paris Agreement 2015. (2015).

  • WorldGBC. Bringing embodied carbon upfront, www.worldgbc.org/embodied-carbon (2019).

  • UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard, (2024).

  • Li, Q. & Wang, Y. Blockchain’s role in supporting circular supply chains in the built environment. In Proceedings of 2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain), pp. 578–583, (IEEE, 2021).

  • Nußholz, J. L. K., Rasmussen, F. N., Whalen, K. & Plepys, A. Material reuse in buildings: implications of a circular business model for sustainable value creation. J. Clean. Prod. 245, 118546 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco, J. L., Engel, H., Imhorst, F., Ribeirinho, M. J., & Sjodin, E. Call for action: seizing the decarbonization opportunity in construction, (2021).

  • Cavallo, M. & Cencioni, D. Circular Economy and good practices. (2017).

  • Wang, K., De Regel, S., Debacker, W., Michiels, J. & Vanderheyden, J. Why invest in a reversible building design?, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 225, 012005 (2019).

  • Andersen, M. S. An introductory note on the environmental economics of the circular economy,. Sustain. Sci. 2, 133–140 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, T. & Rau-Oberhuber, S. Material Matters: Developing Business for a Circular Economy (Routledge, 2022).

  • Morscheck, C. R. Recycling Santa Tecla: The Demolition and Continued Life of an Early Christian Basilica, 81–96. (Taylor & Francis, 2018).

  • BAMB. D7 – Operational Materials Passports, (2019).

  • BAMB. D5 – Framework for Materials Passports, (2017).

  • Honic, M., Kovacic, I. & Rechberger, H. Improving the recycling potential of buildings through Material Passports (MP): an Austrian case study. J. Clean. Prod. 217, 787–797 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisel, F. & Rau-Oberhuber, S. Calculation and evaluation of circularity indicators for the built environment using the case studies of UMAR and Madaster,. J. Clean. Prod. 243, 118482 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. R. & Hoolahan, R. Materials Passports: Accelerating Material Reuse in Construction, London UK, (2024).

  • Atta, I., Bakhoum, E. S. & Marzouk, M. M. Digitizing material passport for sustainable construction projects using BIM. J. Build. Eng. 43, 103233 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora, M., Raspall, F., Cheah, L. & Silva, A. Residential building material stocks and component-level circularity: the case of Singapore,. J. Clean. Prod. 216, 239–248 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Moraga, G., Huysveld, S., De Meester, S. & Dewulf, J. Development of circularity indicators based on the in-use occupation of materials,. J. Clean. Prod. 279, 123889 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Honic, M., Kovacic, I., Aschenbrenner, P., & Ragossnig, A. Material passports for the end-of-life stage of buildings: challenges and potentials. J. Clean. Prod. 319, 128702 (2021).

  • van Capelleveen, G., Vegter, D., Olthaar, M. & van Hillegersberg, J. The anatomy of a passport for the circular economy: a conceptual definition, vision and structured literature review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Adv. 17, 200131 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeets, A., Wang, K., & Drewniok, M. P. Can material passports lower financial barriers for structural steel re-use? IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 225, 012006 (2019).

  • Heinrich, M. & Lang, W. Materials Passports – Best Practice. Innovative Solutions for a Transition to a Circular Economy in the Built Environment, BAMB, Feb, 2019. [Online]. (2019).

  • Reich, R. H., Ayan, J., Alaerts, L. & Van Acker, K. Defining the goals of Product Passports by circular product strategies. Proc. CIRP 116, 257–262 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Charef, R. A digital framework for the implementation of the circular economy in the construction sector: expert opinions, Sustainability 16, 5849 (2024).

  • Markou, I., Sinnott, D. & Thomas, K. Current methodologies of creating material passports: a systematic literature review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 22, e04267 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, B., Honic, M., Leite, F., Herthogs, P., & Stouffs, R. Augmenting materials passports to support disassembly planning based on building information modelling standards. J. Build. Eng. 90, 109083 (2024).

  • Charef, R. & Emmitt, S. Uses of building information modelling for overcoming barriers to a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 285, 124854 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L., Lu, W., Peng, Z. & Webster, C. A blockchain non-fungible token-enabled ‘passport” for construction waste material cross-jurisdictional trading. Autom. Constr. 149, 104783 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahidi, A. et al. RFID-based material passport system in a recycled concrete circular chain. J. Clean. Prod. 442, 140973 (2024).

  • Munaro, M. R. & Tavares, S. F. Materials passport’s review: challenges and opportunities toward a circular economy building sector. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 11, 767–782 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Çetin, S., Gruis, V. & Straub, A. Digitalization for a circular economy in the building industry: Multiple-case study of Dutch social housing organizations. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. Adv. 15, 200110 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, M. & Lang, W. Capture and control of material flows and stocks in urban residential buildings. IOP Conf. Ser. 225, 012001 (2019).

  • UKGBC. Materials passport – practical guide, (2025).

  • Honic, M., Magalhaes, P. M., & Van den Bosch, P. From data templates to material passports and digital product passports. In A circular built environment in the digital age, 1st ed. (eds, De Wolf, C., Cetin, S., & Bocken, N.) Chapter 5, 297 (Springer, 2024).

  • Çetin, S., Raghu, D., Honic, M., Straub, A. & Gruis, V. Data requirements and availabilities for material passports: a digitally enabled framework for improving the circularity of existing buildings. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 40, 422–437 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Trubina, N. et al. Digital Technologies and Material Passports for Circularity in Buildings: An In-Depth Analysis of Current Practices and Emerging Trends, Vol. 489 LNCE. (Springer Nature, 2024).

  • Markou, I., Sinnott, D. & Thomas, K. Methodology for creating a Dynamic Material Passport application powered by microsoft power apps and ChatGPT for circular built environment. In AIARG-2025 Conference (AIARG, 2025).

  • The EU. Circular Economy Action Plan: For a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe (EU, 2020).

  • European Commisssion. Construction Products Regulation (CPR). (2024).

  • Volt, J. & Toth, Z. Definition of the Digital Building Logbook. (2020).

  • European Commission. Level(s): what’s S in It for US? (European Commission, 2023).

  • European Union. EU’s digital product passport: advancing transparency and sustainability. (2024).

  • Alabid, J., Bennadji, A. & Seddiki, M. A review on the energy retrofit policies and improvements of the UK existing buildings, challenges and benefits. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 159, 112161 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H., Moncaster, A., Wilkinson, S. & Remøy, H. Demolition or retention of buildings: drivers at the masterplan scale. Build. Cities 4, 488–506 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, R. Social life cycle assessment of adaptive reuse. Build. Cities 4, 334–351 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H., Moncaster, A., Remøy, H. & Wilkinson, S. Retention not demolition: how heritage thinking can inform carbon reduction. J. Archit. Conserv. 27, 176–194 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, B. Introducing RetroFirst: a new AJ campaign championing reuse in the built environment. Architects’ Journal. (2024).

  • Cheshire, D. Building Revolutions (RIBA Publishing, 2016).

  • GLA. London Plan Guidance – Circular Economy Statements, London UK (GLA, 2022).

  • Copeland, S. & Bilec, M. Buildings as material banks using RFID and building information modeling in a circular economy. Procedia CIRP 90, 143–147 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, A. R. & Charef, R. Demolishing buildings is bad for the planet – here’s an alternative (The Conversation, 2024).

  • Yuan, H., Chini, A. R., Lu, Y. & Shen, L. A dynamic model for assessing the effects of management strategies on the reduction of construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag 32, 521–531 (2012).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Batiactu, Loi Macron: l’obligation de démolition devient l’exception, Batiactu. (2024).

  • Platform CB’23, Passports for the Construction Sector. July, 2022. [Online]. (2022).

  • Shamess, A. & Underwoord, C. Zero waste 2040: the city of Vancouver’s zero waste strategic plan, (2018).

  • Oakland, Oakland 2030 Equitable Climate Action Plan (ECAP), (2020).

  • DEFRA. UK statistics on waste, (2023).

  • Di Maria, A., Eyckmans, J. & Van Acker, K. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. Waste Manag. 75, 3–21 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, K. Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist (Random House, 2017).

  • Krisprantono, K. Conservation of 18 th Century Java Industrial Heritage. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 213, 012041 (2018).

  • Akinade, O. O. et al. Design for Deconstruction (DfD): critical success factors for diverting end-of-life waste from landfills. Waste Manag 60, 3–13 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Queheille, E., Taillandier, F. & Saiyouri, N. Optimization of strategy planning for building deconstruction. Autom. Constr. 98, 236–247 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. EU construction & demolition waste management protocol. (2023).

  • Defra, “UK statistics on waste,” accessed on 5 November, 2024. [Online]. (2024).

  • Costa, A. R., Hoolahan, R., & Martin, M. Acceleration Material Reuse in construction. Two case studies: one life, multiple cycles, a longer life. In Circular Economy for the built environment (ed Charef R.) (Taylor & Francis, 2024).

  • Mellor, T. Expérimentation: un jardin bioclimatique pour Grandalpe. (2024).

  • Interreg NW Europe. Facilitating the circulation of reclaimed building elements in Northwestern Europe (FCRBE), Interreg Nord-West Europe. (2024).

  • FCRBE, “Facilitating the circulation of reclaimed building elements in Northwestern Europe (FCRBE),” Interreg Nord-West Europe. Accessed: Apr, 05, 2023. [Online]. https://vb.nweurope.eu/projects/project-search/fcrbe-facilitating-the-circulation-of-reclaimed-building-elements-in-northwestern-europe/#tab-3.

  • Brand, S. How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built (Onion, 1994).

  • Charef, R., Lu, W. & Hall, D. The transition to the circular economy of the construction industry: Insights into sustainable approaches to improve the understanding. J. Clean. Prod. 364, 132421 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • WBCSD. The Building System Carbon Framework (WBCSD, 2020).

  • European Commission. Ecodesign for sustainable products regulation: making sustainable products in the EU the norm. (2024).

  • NW Europe. Facilitating the circulation of reclaimed building elements (FCRBE), NW Europe. (2024).

  • Luscuere, L. & Mulhall, D. Passports. In Designing for the circular economy, 1st ed. (Routledge, 2018).

  • NBS. What is uniclass? (2025).

  • ICIS. Comparison of OmniClass, Uniclass, Cuneco and CoClass with reference to ISO 12006-2 and ISO 81346-12. (2025).

  • Royano, V., Gibert, V., Serrat, C. & Rapinski, J. Analysis of classification systems for the built environment: Historical perspective, comprehensive review and discussion. J. Build. Eng. 67, 105911 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, W. & Braungart, M. Cradle to Cradle – Remaking the way we make things (Chemical a., 2002).

  • Ismayilova, A. & Silvius, G. Cradle-to-cradle in project management,. Int. J. Circ. Econ. Waste Manag. 1, 54–80 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Domofrance, La résidence Henri Sellier placée au cœur d’un environnement en mutation. (2025).

  • Cruz Rios, F., Grau, D. & Bilec, M. Barriers and enablers to circular building design in the US: an empirical study. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 147, 1–17, (2021).

  • Charef, R., Morel, J. C. & Rakhshan, K. Barriers to implementing the circular economy in the construction sector: a critical review. Sustainability 13, 12989 (2021).

  • Rakhshan, K., Morel, J. C., Alaka, H. & Charef, R. Components reuse in the building sector – a systematic review,. Waste Manag. Res. 38, 347–370 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. & Tucker, R. Overcoming barriers to the reuse of construction waste material in Australia: a review of the literature. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 17, 228–237 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, F., Mjörnell, K. & Janson, U. Reuse of building materials—the perspective of Swedish clients. Clean. Eng. Technol. 23, 100848 (2024).

  • Bellini, A., Andersen, B., Klungseth, N. J. & Tadayon, A. Achieving a circular economy through the effective reuse of construction products: a case study of a residential building. J. Clean. Prod. 450, 141753 (2024).

  • Costa, A. R., Hoolohan, R. & Martin, M. Accelerating material reuse in construction: two case studies: one life, multiple cycles, a longer life, Circular Economy for the Built Environment. In Circular economy for the built environment (Chapter 11) (ed. Charef, R.) (Taylor & Francis Group, 2024).

  • Yahia, A. K. M., Rahman, M. M., Shahjalal, M. & Morshed, A. S. M. Sustainable materials selection in building design and construction. Int. J. Sci. Eng. 1, 93–105 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durao, V., Silvestre, J. D., Mateus, R. & De Brito, J. Economic valuation of life cycle environmental impacts of construction products – a critical analysis. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323 (IOP, 2019).

  • Ilhan, B. & Yobas, B. Measuring construction for social, economic and environmental assessment. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 26, 746–765 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.